State v. Duncan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred in admitting extrinsic evidence of inconsistent statement for impeachment purposes because prosecutor failed to lay proper foundation under HRE Rule 613
• finding a reasonable possibility that an erroneous admission of testimony impeaching a defendant's credibility contributed to the defendant's conviction where his \credibility was the linchpin of his defenses of duress and choice of evils.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Kikuta
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2011-06-08· cited 56×
• State v. Chong Hung Han
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2013-06-19· cited 49×
• State v. Kassebeer
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2008-09-30· cited 43×
• State v. Schnabel.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2012-05-11· cited 36×
• State v. Acker.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2014-02-14· cited 27×
• State v. Taylor
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2011-12-15· cited 15×
• State v. Atwood.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2013-06-03· cited 4×
• State v. Holt
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2007-11-21· cited 1×
• State v. David
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2014-12-15· cited 1×
• State v. CARLUT
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2008-11-05
• State v. David.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2017-12-22
• State v. Navarro
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2022-01-13
• State v. Silva, III
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2022-01-18
• State v. Mersberg
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2022-05-31