Skip to main content

State v. Dukes

Citations

  • 29 Conn. App. 409
  • 616 A.2d 800
  • 1992 Conn. App. LEXIS 392

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defense counsel’s unsolicited comment of “okay,” made in response to court’s statement that it anticipated state to file substituted information, constituted express consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heiman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.