State v. Douglas C.
Citations
- 195 Conn. App. 728
Syllabus
Convicted, after a jury trial, of five counts of the crime of risk of injury to a child, the defendant appealed to this court. The defendant's conviction stemmed from his alleged sexual abuse of five female victims, including C, on various dates while they were under the age of sixteen. The minor victims were often in the presence of the defendant in his home, where the defendant had contact with their intimate parts on multiple occa- sions. Specifically, the defendant grabbed C's breasts over her shirt on multiple occasions from September, 2005 to September, 2006. After the close of the state's case, the defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal, which the trial court granted as to a count alleging sexual assault in the second degree but denied as to the five remaining counts that charged the defendant with the crime of risk of injury to a child. Subsequently, the defendant requested that the court provide a specific unanimity instruction to the jury on the remaining five counts, which the court granted only as to one of those counts. On appeal, the defendant claimed, inter alia, that the court improperly denied his motion for a judgment of acquittal because there was insufficient evidence for the jury to convict him on the count involving C, as the three factor test used by our Supreme Court in State v. Stephen J. R. (309 Conn. 586) to determine whether a child victim's general or nonspecific testimony is sufficient to sustain a conviction in a sexual abuse case was inapplicable to the present case because C was not a very young child at the time she was abused by the defendant and when she testified at trial. Held: 1. The defendant's claim that the trial court improperly denied his motion for a judgment of acquittal was unavailing: a. The defendant could not prevail on his claim that the test used by our Supreme Court in Stephen J. R. was inapplicable to the present case because the leniency with respect to proof that has been formulated to apply in such cases
Judges: Alvord; Prescott; Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-06-28· cited 835×
- United States v. Franklin Delano GipsonFifth Circuit· 1977-06-06· cited 381×
- Burch v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1979-04-17· cited 255×
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-30· cited 222×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-04-24· cited 160×
- State v. SpigaroloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-03-14· cited 159×
- Bop-Nin Chow v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-07-03· cited 115×
- United States v. Joseph M. MargiottaSecond Circuit· 1981-04-10· cited 114×
- State v. DennisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1963-01-15· cited 101×
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-12-11· cited 100×
- State v. HauckSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-12-28· cited 99×
- State v. SnookSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-03-07· cited 96×
- State v. FamigliettiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-07-23· cited 88×
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-12-13· cited 86×
- State v. PareSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-07-11· cited 71×
- Bechtel Construction, Inc. v. Laborers District CouncilSupreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 56×
- State v. MancinoneConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-07-19· cited 54×
- State v. ReddickSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-01-26· cited 53×
- State v. SaracenoConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-07-19· cited 53×
- State v. BeniteConnecticut Appellate Court· 1986-04-08· cited 34×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.