Skip to main content

State v. Doty

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 917

Syllabus

The trial court did not err when it did not sue sponte order a presentence-investigative report prior to issuing its sentencing decision because a presentence-investigative report is not required in misdemeanor cases and where appellant requested the trial court proceed immediately to sentencing. The trial court also did not err by sentencing appellant to a total aggregate 90-day jail term consisting of three consecutive 30-day sentences on each of the three offenses for which he pled guilty where the record supported the trial court's decision sentencing appellant to the maximum sentence available.

Judges: S. Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.