State v. Doty
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 917
Syllabus
The trial court did not err when it did not sue sponte order a presentence-investigative report prior to issuing its sentencing decision because a presentence-investigative report is not required in misdemeanor cases and where appellant requested the trial court proceed immediately to sentencing. The trial court also did not err by sentencing appellant to a total aggregate 90-day jail term consisting of three consecutive 30-day sentences on each of the three offenses for which he pled guilty where the record supported the trial court's decision sentencing appellant to the maximum sentence available.
Judges: S. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-13· cited 10×
- State v. MuhireOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-10· cited 9×
- State v. HensonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-11· cited 5×
- State v. LikensOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-12· cited 5×
- State v. PowersOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-13· cited 5×
- State v. RamirezOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-29· cited 3×
- State v. DowningOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-25
- State v. SteeleOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-06-09
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.