State v. Dotson
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 499
Syllabus
SEARCH AND SEIZURE - WAIVER - COUNSEL: A suspect may limit the scope of his or her consent and where defendant consented to a pat down search for weapons only and the state presented no evidence that the officer who conducted the pat down determined by \plain feel\ that a thin straw found on defendant's person was most likely contraband, the seizure of the straw violated the Fourth Amendment. Where defendant affirmatively relinquished his right to challenge the search of his car, he waived review of the issue on appeal. Where the record does not show that any alleged deficiency in defense counsel's representation was outcome-determinative, defendant has failed to demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel.
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 2,669×
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,277×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- State v. RogersOhio Supreme Court· 2015-06-24· cited 703×
- City of Xenia v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court· 1988-06-22· cited 509×
- State v. SkaggsOhio Supreme Court· 1978-03-01· cited 227×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.