Dean v. Exotic Veneers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing this court’s later trend toward a more expansive conception of a “claim”
• \Nothing prevented him from presenting his claim against the receiver on the alternative theories of express contract and quantum meruit and from having them both adjudicated at the same time.\
• describing the phrase as a “slipper/’ one that varies with its context
• a \principal purpos[e] of res judicata [is] prevention of harassment of defendants by successive legal proceedings\
• “The number and extent of operative facts included within a single cause of action are to be determined pragmatically, mainly by considerations of practical trial convenience.”
• discussing this court’s former application of the “same evidence” test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).