New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 4/3/1981
State v. Dolce
Citations
- 428 A.2d 947
- 178 N.J. Super. 275
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- acknowledging the \broad powers conferred upon the Racing Commission in light of statutory policy sought to be achieved by our Legislature\
- horse racing in New Jersey has been subject to pervasive and long-standing control; warrantless inspections thereof are thus constitutional
- upholding a warrantless search authorized by administrative regulation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Michels, Ard and Furman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Shoemaker v. HandelThird Circuit· 1986-07-10· cited 118×
- In Re Application of MartinSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1982-06-30· cited 89×
- De Vitis v. New Jersey Racing Com'nNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1985-07-15· cited 62×
- State v. SantiagoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-10-20· cited 29×
- Delguidice v. New Jersey Racing CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1985-07-17· cited 29×
- Shoemaker v. HandelD. New Jersey· 1985-09-09· cited 21×
- State v. RednorNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1985-08-09· cited 21×
- State in Interest of TLOSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-08-08· cited 18×
- Shoemaker v. HandelD. New Jersey· 1985-05-13· cited 16×
- Allen v. Passaic Cty.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-06-23· cited 15×
- State v. TurcotteNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-03-08· cited 13×
- State v. BonaccursoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-03-15· cited 11×
- State v. EngerudSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-08-08· cited 10×
- State v. EvansNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1981-10-26· cited 9×
- In Re Guardianship Services RegulationsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1984-12-31· cited 9×
- Maietta v. NJ Racing Comm'nNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1982-02-23· cited 9×
- Pullin v. Louisiana State Racing Com'nSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1985-11-21· cited 5×
- Wendling v. NJ RACING COM'NNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1995-02-14· cited 5×
- HEALTH DEPT. v. RoehslerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-04-06· cited 2×
- Medical Society v. RobinsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-06-01
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court· 1970-10-12· cited 4,391×
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 3,591×
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1973-12-11· cited 3,538×
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court· 1977-06-21· cited 2,561×
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-05· cited 1,768×
- Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 1,484×
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court· 1978-05-23· cited 1,428×
- Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 1,282×
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 1,228×
- United States v. BiswellSupreme Court· 1972-05-15· cited 945×
- United States v. EdwardsSupreme Court· 1974-03-26· cited 917×
- Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-02-25· cited 732×
- United States v. PeltierSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 693×
- New Jersey Guild of Hearing Aid Dispensers v. LongSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1978-03-09· cited 356×
- Smith v. District Court of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court· 1971-10-12· cited 249×
- In re SkolnickSupreme Court· 1969-10-13· cited 237×
- State v. PatinoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-05-19· cited 138×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.