State v. Dohme

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 561

Syllabus

Appellant's claim that her trial counsel was ineffective in failing to advise her about intervention in lieu of conviction (\ILC\) before pleading guilty to receiving stolen property lacks merit. Appellant does not claim that she would have gone to trial as opposed to pleading guilty had counsel advised her of ILC. There is also nothing in the record indicating that counsel failed to advise Appellant about ILC, and even if counsel had failed to do so, such a failure does not amount to deficient performance under the circumstances of this case. Affirmed.