State v. Doe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The State is aggrieved by a disposition contrary to law and may properly challenge such a disposition on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gonzales
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-05-08· cited 119×
• State v. Heinsen
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2005-09-09· cited 86×
• State v. Ahasteen
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-07-30· cited 56×
• State v. Santillanes
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1980-12-16· cited 28×
• State v. Alvarez
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-10-04· cited 20×
• State v. Montoya
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2010-10-12· cited 17×
• State v. Michael R.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-10-06· cited 11×
• In re Christobal V.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-05-30· cited 9×
• Matter of Ruben O.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-04-20· cited 8×
• A Minor v. Juvenile Division of the Seventh Judicial District Court
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1981-06-16· cited 7×
• State, Children, Youth & Families Department v. Paul G.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-02-06· cited 5×
• State v. Michael V.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-06-07· cited 4×
• Ragner v. Zielke
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 3×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Heckathorn v. Heckathorn
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1967-01-30· cited 57×
• Sneed v. Cox
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1964-12-07· cited 42×
• State v. Peters
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1961-11-07· cited 28×
• State v. Doe
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-06-14· cited 11×
• In Re Doe
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1973-10-31· cited 11×
• State v. Doe
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-12-05· cited 9×
• State v. Linam
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-08-02· cited 8×
• Doe v. State
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1978-08-21· cited 7×
• State v. Doe
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1979-02-13· cited 4×