Skip to main content

State v. Alvarez

Citations

  • 823 P.2d 324
  • 113 N.M. 82

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the State has no constitutional right to appeal from suppression orders
  • stating that district court appeals under Section 39-3-3 do not subsume interlocutory appeals with constitutional appeals as of right and that the State does not always have a constitutional right to appeal
  • acknowledging that in many cases the State will have the option to continue prosecution even after a ruling suppressing evidence because the evidence suppressed may relate to one or more but not all of the charges
  • indicating an interlocutory appeal is not a codification of a constitutional right to one appeal, but rather a statutory right which the legislature provided in recognition of the right of appeal under Article VI, Section 2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flores, Alarid, Donnelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.