New Mexico Court of Appeals· 12/5/1978
State v. Doe
Citations
- 588 P.2d 555
- 92 N.M. 354
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a child’s statement that he did not object to the entrance of a consent decree was sufficient to establish an admission under the Children’s Court Rules and thereby authorize a consent decree
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hernandez, Lopez, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Le MierNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2017-04-27· cited 79×
- State v. LayneNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-06-26· cited 31×
- Scoggins v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1990-11-26· cited 15×
- State v. DoeNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1980-10-16· cited 15×
- In re Crystal L.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-04-17· cited 13×
- State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. DoeNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-07-18· cited 3×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. MadrigalNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1973-07-25· cited 32×
- State v. GabaldonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-09-26· cited 30×
- State v. RossNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-03-27· cited 29×
- Pizza Hut of Santa Fe, Inc. v. BranchNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1976-06-08· cited 29×
- Beverly v. Conquistadores, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1975-06-04· cited 19×
- Eller v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1978-08-09· cited 19×
- Campos v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 15×
- State v. DoeNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-06-14· cited 11×
- Doe v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1978-08-21· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.