Washington Supreme Court· 12/7/2006
State v. Dixon
Citations
- 159 Wash. 2d 65
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “When a trial judge’s function is to decide 27 whether the evidence is sufficient to support a finding, a reviewing court’s function will be the same.”
- a trial court does not abuse its discretion by conditioning relevance when “the defense’s desire to prove fact A . . . was dependent on proof of fact B”
- evidence that is too speculative is not relevant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Madsen, Owens, Sanders
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re the Recall of LindquistWashington Supreme Court· 2011-07-21· cited 56×
- State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court· 2011-10-06· cited 32×
- State v. GriffinWashington Supreme Court· 2012-01-05· cited 29×
- State Of Washington, Appellant/cross-resp v. Cory Pratt, Resp./cross-appellantCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2019-12-17· cited 23×
- State v. CoronaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-09-20· cited 19×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-03-06· cited 12×
- State Of Washington v. Frederick Kenneth Hill, IiiCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-12-17· cited 7×
- State v. WhitakerWashington Supreme Court· 2020-03-19· cited 7×
- Cody C. Thornock v. The Hon. Michael LamboCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2020-08-03· cited 7×
- State v. PettersonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2017-03-21· cited 4×
- State v. LambCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-09-13· cited 3×
- Tabingo v. Am. Triumph LLCWashington Supreme Court· 2017-03-09
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court· 1994-10-13· cited 831×
- State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court· 1985-09-05· cited 721×
- State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court· 2003-06-19· cited 387×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1986-10-02· cited 277×
- State v. EasterWashington Supreme Court· 1996-09-19· cited 264×
- State v. BlackwellWashington Supreme Court· 1993-02-18· cited 260×
- State v. NealWashington Supreme Court· 2001-09-06· cited 199×
- State v. RayWashington Supreme Court· 1991-03-21· cited 172×
- State v. RundquistCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-11-16· cited 152×
- State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court· 1978-02-02· cited 152×
- State v. LewisWashington Supreme Court· 1990-09-20· cited 143×
- State v. KarpenskiCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-02-12· cited 56×
- Kosmas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-07-25· cited 51×
- State v. ReilNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-06-30· cited 25×
- State v. DickensonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-06-22· cited 24×
- Bell v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 2002-08-22· cited 24×
- State v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-04-26· cited 21×
- State v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-08-12· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.