State v. Dixon
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 2741
Syllabus
The trial court did not err by denying appellant's petition for postconviction relief in reliance on the doctrine of res judicata. Although the trial court arguably misconstrued the basis of the petition, the issues raised by appellant were adjudicated previously, or were forfeited because appellant could have, but did not, raise them in past appeals and petitions for postconviction relief. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
- Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court· 1995-08-30· cited 1,323×
- State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court· 2010-12-23· cited 1,066×
- State v. CollinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-08-23· cited 44×
- State v. McCainOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-08· cited 15×
- State v. DixonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-25· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.