State v. Dixon

Citations

• 2021 Ohio 225

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in treating the appellant's pro se filing seeking \summary judgment\ as an untimely petition for post-conviction relief under R.C. 2953.21 or in dismissing it on that basis. The appellant's substantive arguments also fail on their merits, including arguments that he should have been convicted of attempting to commit offenses rather than being complicit in the commission of those offenses and that he could not be convicted of a firearm specification where he personally did not display, brandish or use a firearm and did not have direct contact with the victim. Judgment affirmed.