State v. Dixon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the statute defining the offense of endangering the welfare of a minor requires that a defendant knowingly permit a minor to enter or remain in a place where there is unlawful drug activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Prophet
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-16· cited 28×
• State v. Rutley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-11-16· cited 22×
• State v. Alvarado
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-07-24· cited 21×
• State v. Jimenez-Correo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-02-15· cited 3×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. King
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-01-31· cited 170×
• Delgado v. Souders
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-05-16· cited 82×
• State v. Beason
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-10-11· cited 21×
• State v. Jaha
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-03-10· cited 10×
• State v. Howley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-11-16· cited 5×