Supreme Court of Vermont· 1/8/1999
State v. Dixon
Citations
- 725 A.2d 920
- 169 Vt. 15
- 1999 Vt. LEXIS 2
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- acknowledging that 13 V.S.A. § 3705(a)(1) should be informed by common law and read in context with it
- explaining that this Court independently applies the standard set out in Rule 12(d)
- when reviewing a motion to dismiss, evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the State, and modifying evidence is excluded from consideration
- when reviewing a motion to dismiss, evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the State, and modifying evidence is excluded from consideration
- we assume statutory terminology is consistent with common law
- “The common law is clear that the landlord may not prevent invitees or licensees of the tenant from entering the tenant’s premises by passing through the common area. Moreover, the law is clear United States, 106 A.3d 1087, 1090-91 (D.C. 2015) (citing 14 DCMR § 9600.5 (2020
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amestoy, Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Skoglund
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- City of Bremerton v. WidellWashington Supreme Court· 2002-06-06· cited 44×
- State v. BaronSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-02-27· cited 23×
- State v. SquiersSupreme Court of Vermont· 2006-03-24· cited 22×
- State v. HardySupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-08-06· cited 20×
- State of Vermont v. Christian J. NollSupreme Court of Vermont· 2018-10-12· cited 17×
- State v. BrennanSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-06-01· cited 16×
- In Re Jason Allen D.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-07-12· cited 15×
- State v. FreeSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-02-17· cited 15×
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-06-22· cited 14×
- In Re Grievance of DanforthSupreme Court of Vermont· 2002-10-04· cited 10×
- State v. CarlinSupreme Court of Vermont· 2010-08-19· cited 8×
- State v. William SchenkSupreme Court of Vermont· 2018-05-04· cited 7×
- State v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-10-19· cited 6×
- State v. StamperSupreme Court of Vermont· 2011-02-07· cited 5×
- State v. Jonathan C. RichardsSupreme Court of Vermont· 2021-05-28· cited 3×
- State v. Elizabeth MacFarlandSupreme Court of Vermont· 2021-11-05· cited 2×
- Nijae Odumn v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2020-05-28
- State v. Scott VogelSupreme Court of Vermont· 2022-01-28
- State v. AgostaSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-11-09
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. O'NEILLSupreme Court of Vermont· 1996-06-14· cited 69×
- State v. ReadSupreme Court of Vermont· 1996-03-22· cited 65×
- State v. FangerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-06-30· cited 57×
- Commonwealth v. RichardsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1943-04-26· cited 41×
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-06-16· cited 34×
- Folgueras v. HassleW.D. Michigan· 1971-09-07· cited 31×
- State v. KrethSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-09-16· cited 31×
- Ellis v. KnowlesCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1954-04-12· cited 25×
- People v. RynberkAppellate Court of Illinois· 1980-12-24· cited 22×
- Arbee v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-11-09· cited 20×
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-06-01· cited 19×
- L.D.L. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-06· cited 15×
- State v. SchaffelConnecticut Appellate Court· 1966-12-16· cited 8×
- Williams v. LubberingSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1906-02-26· cited 7×
- Morra v. HillSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1961-11-30· cited 6×
- Bean v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-04-02· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.