Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 4/26/1943
Commonwealth v. Richardson
Citations
- 313 Mass. 632
- 48 N.E.2d 678
- 146 A.L.R. 648
- 1943 Mass. LEXIS 748
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- G.L.c. 266, §120, construed not to apply to the activities of ministers who go from house to house distributing or selling religious literature
- “entry upon another’s close, or into his house, at usual and reasonable hours, and in a customary manner, for any of the common purposes of life, cannot be regarded as a trespass”
- “[The statute’s] only purpose is to protect the rights of those in lawful control of property to forbid entrance by those whom they are unwilling to receive, and to exclude them if, having entered, those in control see fit to command them to leave”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dolan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,779×
- Alexis v. McDonald's Restaurants of Massachusetts, Inc.First Circuit· 1995-10-10· cited 232×
- Commonwealth v. HoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-07-05· cited 78×
- State v. CariagaIdaho Supreme Court· 1974-04-30· cited 46×
- City of Missoula v. MixMontana Supreme Court· 1950-01-19· cited 42×
- State v. HoytSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-04-24· cited 40×
- Hall v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1948-09-08· cited 36×
- Anderson v. DeVriesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1950-06-12· cited 35×
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1999-01-08· cited 31×
- Griffin & Greene v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1961-06-08· cited 16×
- State v. QuinnellSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-06-09· cited 13×
- Hynes v. City of LakelandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-05-04· cited 12×
- People v. VaughanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1944-07-28· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. AkmakjianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1944-04-28· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. MagadiniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2016-06-23· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. VinnicombeMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1990-02-13· cited 8×
- City of Fort Scott v. ArbuckleSupreme Court of Kansas· 1947-12-06· cited 8×
- BEACONSFIELD TOWNE HOUSE CONDOMINIUM TRUST v. ZussmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1993-12-07· cited 7×
- Commonwealth v. KrasnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1971-10-01· cited 7×
- Morra v. HillSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1961-11-30· cited 6×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1940-05-20· cited 3,669×
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court· 1938-03-28· cited 1,301×
- Jamison v. TexasSupreme Court· 1943-03-08· cited 324×
- Plummer v. DillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1892-05-20· cited 191×
- Largent v. TexasSupreme Court· 1943-03-08· cited 131×
- Ashapa v. ReedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1932-10-26· cited 101×
- McKee v. GratzSupreme Court· 1922-11-13· cited 73×
- Hart v. ColeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1892-06-21· cited 31×
- Norris v. Hugh Nawn Contracting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1910-05-18· cited 28×
- Bacon v. JaquesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1942-10-31· cited 21×
- Thomas v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1939-02-28· cited 17×
- City of Cincinnati v. MosierOhio Court of Appeals· 1939-01-30· cited 15×
- Riley v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1900-11-27· cited 12×
- Melville Shoe Corp. v. KozminskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1929-06-27· cited 9×
- Tremont Theatre Amusement Co. v. BrunoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1917-01-04· cited 7×
- State v. . LawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1888-09-05· cited 3×
- Freeman v. WrightAppellate Court of Illinois· 1904-03-16· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.