Skip to main content

Richard Bernard Moore v. Bryan P. Stirling

Syllabus

In this habeas corpus matter, we hold the petitioner has presented a cognizable claim for the Court's consideration, and we clarify our precedent regarding the comparative proportionality review that is statutorily required in all cases resulting in a capital sentence, but we conclude the petitioner has not established that he is entitled to habeas relief from this Court.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.