Supreme Court of North Carolina· 8/16/2019
State v. Diaz
Citations
- 831 S.E.2d 532
- 372 N.C. 493
Syllabus
Whether a nineteen-year-old defendant should receive a new trial after being convicted of child abduction and statutory rape of a fourteen-year-old girl whether the trial court committed prejudicial error by admitting a copy of defendant's affidavit of indigency at trial, thereby establishing defendant's age, which was an essential element of these offenses.
Judges: Hudson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SimpkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2020-02-28
- State v. CobbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-06-16
- State v. ShulerSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2021-08-13
- State v. FarookSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2022-05-06
- State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2026-05-06
- State v. PalmiterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2026-05-06
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 2,033×
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court· 1990-06-18· cited 976×
- Doe v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-06-22· cited 420×
- State v. DiazCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-11-21· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.