Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/6/2024
State v. Diaz
Citations
- 252 N.E.3d 596
- 2024 Ohio 3427
Syllabus
Trial court abused its discretion when it permitted an alleged rape victim to testify that she only reported the rape after she saw the defendant's name on a sex offender website. The risk of unfair prejudice substantially outweighed the evidence's probative value and the error was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
Judges: Osowik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court· 1995-11-22· cited 957×
- State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-09-13· cited 457×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 2012-12-06· cited 417×
- State v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 256×
- State v. AllenOhio Supreme Court· 1987-04-01· cited 232×
- State v. Hartman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-09-22· cited 223×
- State v. RahmanOhio Supreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 221×
- State v. Harris (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-01-22· cited 151×
- State v. Worley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-07-01· cited 117×
- State v. Smith (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-09-22· cited 84×
- State v. Boaston (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-03-26· cited 72×
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-02· cited 34×
- State v. KamerOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-17· cited 21×
- State v. ArtisOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-28· cited 16×
- State v. WrightOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-02-23· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.