State v. Wright
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 668
Syllabus
Trial court did not err in imposing sentences for discharge of a firearm upon or over a public road or highway and an attendant firearm specification because the specification does not merge with the principal offense as it is a penalty enhancement and not a separate offense. Trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds, where appellant was brought to trial within 90 days of his arrest, after taking into account time periods that were tolled under R.C. 2945.72.
Judges: Jensen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-09· cited 2,256×
- State v. SageOhio Supreme Court· 1987-07-08· cited 1,978×
- State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court· 1995-11-22· cited 957×
- State v. RuffOhio Supreme Court· 2015-03-25· cited 912×
- State v. FranklinOhio Supreme Court· 1991-11-20· cited 798×
- State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court· 1990-08-15· cited 737×
- State v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court· 1988-10-05· cited 376×
- State v. SingerOhio Supreme Court· 1977-05-18· cited 275×
- State v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court· 1991-01-09· cited 207×
- State v. FordOhio Supreme Court· 2011-02-24· cited 122×
- State v. RameyOhio Supreme Court· 2012-06-28· cited 105×
- State v. BentonOhio Court of Appeals· 2000-03-17· cited 79×
- State v. HohenbergerOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-08-27· cited 15×
- State v. SzlohOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-08-13· cited 10×
- State v. ArringtonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-28· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.