Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/8/2020

State v. DeVaughns

Citations

2020 Ohio 2850

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion for leave to file a motion for new trial pursuant to Crim.R. 33(A)(6), because his arguments were barred by the law of the case doctrine and res judicata. Additionally, appellant's arguments regarding the ineffectiveness of his trial and appellate counsel were barred by res judicata. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Donovan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Howard
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-21· cited 1×
State v. DeVaughns
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-24· cited 1×
State v. DeVaughns
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-22· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Strickland v. Washington
Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
State v. Bradley
Ohio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
State v. Perry
Ohio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,562×
Nolan v. Nolan
Ohio Supreme Court· 1984-05-02· cited 893×
State v. Murnahan
Ohio Supreme Court· 1992-02-19· cited 753×
State v. Metcalf
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-28· cited 17×
State v. Lenoir
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-15· cited 17×
State v. Hiler
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-15· cited 16×
State v. DeVaughns
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-07· cited 8×
State v. Wilson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-01-25· cited 7×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.