Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 6/11/2002
State v. DeShay
Citations
- 645 N.W.2d 185
- 2002 Minn. App. LEXIS 650
- 2002 WL 1277967
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The conspiracy statute does not require that the state prove DeShay personally sold ten or more grams of cocaine within a 90–day period; only that he participated in an agreement to sell ten or more grams of cocaine within a 90–day period.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hanson, Schumacher, Poritsky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-05-26· cited 349×
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-03-31· cited 305×
- State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-12-07· cited 267×
- State v. MacKSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-05-16· cited 207×
- State v. TrogSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-17· cited 160×
- People v. ValdezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-10-15· cited 134×
- State v. KuhnauSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-03-01· cited 128×
- State v. OlkonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-08-29· cited 113×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-12-23· cited 97×
- Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-09-14· cited 84×
- Goeb v. TharaldsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-08-17· cited 77×
- State v. AltonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-12-09· cited 74×
- State v. GivensSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-03-08· cited 64×
- Utz v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-10-20· cited 57×
- State v. WalenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-05-29· cited 51×
- State v. SpainSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-02-25· cited 50×
- State v. TranSupreme Court of Kansas· 1993-02-12· cited 46×
- State v. PeakeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-04-26· cited 42×
- State v. SchmitSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-10-28· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.