Skip to main content

State v. Delp

Citations

  • 178 P.3d 259
  • 218 Or. App. 17
  • 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding, as a matter of first impression, that defendant did not have protected privacy interest, under Oregon Constitution, in noncontent subscriber information held by his internet service provider
  • whether a protected privacy right in a particular thing exists is a legal, rather than factual, conclusion
  • evidence of the defendant’s “means and opportunity” does not give rise to an inference that the alleged victim was subjected to the specific acts set forth in the indictment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Wollheim, Sercombe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.