State v. Magana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that certain statutes created a privacy interest in records of cell phone providers, where the records “were created in the course of the regular operations of the cell phone providers” and did not violate the statutes referenced by the defendant
• a defendant’s arguments under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution do not preserve federal Fourth Amendment arguments
• “We review a trial court’s ruling on a demurrer to a charging instrument for errors of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Delp
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-02-13· cited 26×
• State v. Carle
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-08· cited 11×
• State v. Sparks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-11-26· cited 11×
• State v. Stout
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-21· cited 7×
• State v. Kelly
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-06-04· cited 5×
• State v. Molver
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-01-20· cited 4×
• State v. Ghim
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-10· cited 2×