Skip to main content

State v. Dell

Citations

  • 967 P.2d 507
  • 156 Or. App. 184
  • 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 1566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the issue of whether defense counsel provided inadequate assistance by not calling the defendant to the stand is not a claim that may be raised on direct appeal, but rather “must be made in the context of a post-conviction proceeding”
  • concluding that the issue of whether defense counsel provided inadequate assistance by not calling the defendant to the stand is not a claim that may be raised on direct appeal, but rather “must be made in the context of a post-conviction proceeding”
  • a represented defendant does not have a right, under either the state or federal constitution, to serve as co-counsel
  • “[C]laims of inadequate assistance of counsel may not be raised on direct appeal.”
  • “[C]laims of inadequate assistance of counsel may not be raised on direct appeal.”
  • “[C]laims of inadequate assistance of counsel may not be raised on direct appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riggs, Landau, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.