State v. Dayton

Citations

• 2018 Ohio 3003

Syllabus

Defendant-appellant's endangering-children, complicity-to-endangering-children, and permitting-child-abuse convictions are supported by sufficient evidence. Defendant-appellant's gross-sexual-imposition, endangering-children, complicity-to-endangering-children, and permitting-child-abuse convictions are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Defendant-appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court's failure to provide the jury with a mandatory accomplice-testimony instruction under R.C. 2923.03(D) is not plain error.