Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/17/2023

State v. Davis

Citations

2023 Ohio 487

Syllabus

Counsel's decisions regarding which witness to call fall within the realm of trial strategy. Speculation as to what an uncalled witness would have said at trial is not sufficient for a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Sufficient evidence supports the judgment of the trial court. Jury did not lose its way and the judgment is not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Judges: Osowik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Strickland v. Washington
Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
State v. Thompkins
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
State v. Jenks
Ohio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
State v. Bradley
Ohio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
State v. Smith
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
State v. Lott
Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-06-06· cited 1,930×
State v. Wilson
Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-05-23· cited 1,198×
State v. LaMar
Ohio Supreme Court· 2002-05-15· cited 820×
State v. Conway
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-06-21· cited 704×
State v. Yarbrough
Ohio Supreme Court· 2002-05-15· cited 625×
State v. Tibbetts
Ohio Supreme Court· 2001-07-05· cited 477×
State v. Perez
Ohio Supreme Court· 2009-12-02· cited 306×
Chris Anthony Arnold v. State of Arkansas
Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2022-10-27· cited 19×
State v. Jasso
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-01-25· cited 4×
State v. Scruggs
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-25· cited 3×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.