Ohio Supreme Court· 2/19/1992

State v. Davis

Citations

63 Ohio St. 3d 44
584 N.E.2d 1192
1992 Ohio LEXIS 221

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “a panel of judges is presumed to ‘consider only relevant, competent and admissible evidence in its deliberations’ ”
“Judges, unlike juries, are presumed to know the law. Judges are trained and expected to disregard any extraneous influences in deliberations”
“Judges, unlike juries, are presumed to know the law. Judges are trained and expected to disregard any extraneous influences in deliberations”
“A panel of judges is presumed to ‘consider only relevant, competent and admissible evidence in its deliberations’ ”
affirming reimposition of death sentence on remand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.