State v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in absence of findings of fact, appellate court unable to hold that trial court abused its discretion in granting defendant’s motion to suppress
• in absence of findings of fact, appellate court unable to hold that trial court abused its discretion in granting defendant's motion to suppress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cardenas
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2001-02-01· cited 66×
• State v. Guo
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2001-12-27· cited 24×
• State v. Johnny Burgess
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-11-12
• Horace Lee Caruthers v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-08-30

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Green v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-09-11· cited 1,305×
• Meek v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-05-23· cited 239×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-11-20· cited 142×
• State v. Johnson
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1995-04-20· cited 71×
• State v. Rivenburgh
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1996-10-09· cited 28×
• Alamo Carriage Service, Inc. v. City of San Antonio
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1989-04-12· cited 24×