Skip to main content

State v. Davis

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 1833

Syllabus

The State presented sufficient evidence to support appellant's conviction for one count of littering, and her conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not err when it admitted the victims' security camera footage into evidence pursuant to Evid.R. 901(A). Defense counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to the admission of the security camera footage. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.