Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 4/22/2014

State v. Davis

Citations

  • 2014 Ohio 1615
  • 139 Ohio St. 3d 122
  • 9 N.E.3d 1031

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the “Sixth Amendment never has been thought to guarantee a right to a jury determination of” the appropriate punishment to be imposed on an individual
  • finding the issue forfeited but noting that “Padilla’s holding concerns what an attorney must advise a defendant before the defendant enters a plea of guilty [and not] what a trial court must advise a defendant before accepting a jury waiver”
  • finding the issue forfeited but noting that “Padilla’s holding concerns what an attorney must advise a defendant before the defendant enters a plea of guilty [and not] what a trial court must advise a defendant before accepting a jury waiver”
  • “‘Evidence of cost effectiveness of the death sentence does not bear on a defendant’s character, prior record or the circumstances of the offense.’ Al-Mosawi v. State, 929 P.2d 270, 287 (Okla.Crim.App.1996
  • “Davis’s claims center on the fact that the three-judge panel that sentenced him in 2009 was not the same three-judge panel before which he had expected to be tried and sentenced when he waived a jury trial in 1984.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pfeifer, O'Neill, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

82 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.