Court of Appeals of Washington· 9/4/1984

State v. Davis

Citations

686 P.2d 1143
38 Wash. App. 600
1984 Wash. App. LEXIS 3464

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

referring to comments on defendant's silence at time of detention and arrest as comments on post-arrest silence
rejecting Fletcher v. Weir analysis under state constitutional provision identical to federal counterpart
use of post-arrest silence by the State to impeach or as substantive evidence violated a defendant's state constitutional right to due process regardless of whether Miranda warnings were given
although not controlling, federal cases construing the federal due process clause are entitled to great weight in interpreting Const, art. 1, § 3
use of post-arrest silence by the State to impeach or as substantive evidence violated a defendant’s state constitutional right to due process regardless of whether Miranda warnings were given
because the state due process clause is virtually identical to the federal due process clause, federal cases are entitled to great weight but do not control

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ringold, Durham, Scholfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.