· 4/16/1984
State Ex Rel. Friedman v. Provaznik
Citations
- 668 S.W.2d 76
- 17 Educ. L. Rep. 426
- 1984 Mo. LEXIS 320
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- quashing the writ but not denying its appropriateness within the grand jury context
- an in camera examination provides the opportunity to determine what may be protected by the work product immunity
- grand jury inquiry justifies limited disclosure of material possibly subject to attorney-client privilege
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Higgins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.