State v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In cases involving sex crimes, the inflammatory nature of the crime itself renders the potential for prejudice high, and the * * * rule is strictly applied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Clay
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1987-01-14· cited 21×
• State v. Baughman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-01-05· cited 12×
• State v. Dibala
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-06-02· cited 8×
• State v. Zybach
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-10-05· cited 5×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Manrique
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-01-30· cited 117×
• State v. Start
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1913-05-20· cited 93×
• State v. Kristich
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1961-03-01· cited 60×
• State v. Zimmerlee
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1972-01-19· cited 58×
• State v. Hockings
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-04-11· cited 53×
• State v. Harrison
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1969-06-11· cited 39×
• State v. White
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1906-10-23· cited 33×
• Redsecker v. Wade
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1913-07-22· cited 27×
• State v. Deal
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1908-11-24· cited 26×
• State v. Johnson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-01-27· cited 22×
• State v. Sicks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-04-03· cited 20×
• Youngblood v. Sullivan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-05-11· cited 20×
• State v. Jackson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-11-15· cited 13×
• State v. Urlacher
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-09-17· cited 12×
• State v. Henley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-12-06· cited 8×
• State v. Johann
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-05-15· cited 3×