State v. Baughman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• uncharged misconduct evidence of signature crimes is only relevant to establish the identity of the perpetrator of a crime
• uncharged misconduct evidence of signature crimes is only relevant to establish the identity of the perpetrator of a crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Phillips
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-12-19· cited 19×
• State v. Yong
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-06-28· cited 15×
• State v. Deloretto
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-07-23· cited 15×
• State v. Bunting
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-09-10· cited 8×
• State v. Pitt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-08-18· cited 6×
• People v. Williams
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2016-04-07· cited 6×
• State v. Teitsworth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-06-26· cited 5×
• State v. Hutton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-05-16· cited 3×
• Honstein v. Metro West Ambulance Service, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-05-12· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Johns
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-08-26· cited 242×
• State v. Pinnell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-02-07· cited 116×
• State v. Phillips
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-10-22· cited 35×
• State v. Rinkin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-05-29· cited 21×
• State v. Sicks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-04-03· cited 20×
• State v. Sterling
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-11-26· cited 15×
• State v. Irons
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-09-15· cited 15×
• State v. Barnum
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-11-04· cited 11×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-10-05· cited 6×