State v. Dibala

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that where the state had “incorporated OEC 404(4) in its entirety” in a memorandum to the trial court and “also cited OEC 404(4) at the pretrial hearing,” it had identified the issue and cited the source sufficiently for preservation purposes
• class of victims inquiry does not require the victims to be “identical in every respect”
• in two incidents involving sex abuse, victims, who were seven and 12, were in the same class of victims because they were close in age and were “children in the defendant’s care”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).