State v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• for purposes of enhancement using a prior deferred sentence, conviction is the polestar, not the sentence imposed
• the fact of conviction is a determination of guilt, regardless of the sentence imposed
• discussing the Habitual Offender Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Mondragon
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-03-24· cited 568×
• State v. Bachicha
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-01-31· cited 47×
• State v. Herbstman
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-12-23· cited 42×
• State v. Woodruff
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-11-21· cited 37×
• State v. Rueda
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-12-16· cited 28×
• State v. Apache
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-05-22· cited 27×
• State v. Arrington
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-04-16· cited 20×
• State v. Marquez
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-11-25· cited 11×
• State v. Gaede
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-12-07· cited 9×
• State v. Barber
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1989-07-18· cited 5×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Methola v. County of Eddy
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1980-12-31· cited 125×
• State v. Nance
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-10-10· cited 119×
• State v. Lujan
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1977-02-14· cited 27×
• State v. Santillanes
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-07-22· cited 23×
• State v. Davis
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-06-20· cited 1×