New Mexico Court of Appeals· 4/16/1993
State v. Arrington
Citations
- 855 P.2d 133
- 115 N.M. 559
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that evidence of the defendant’s medical condition and inability of correctional facility to provide necessary care sufficient to support finding that incarceration would be cruel and unusual
- holding that evidence of the defendant's medical condition and inability of correctional facility to provide necessary care sufficient to support finding that incarceration would be cruel and unusual
- affirming the district court’s ruling that mandatory incarceration would 5 constitute cruel and unusual punishment due to the defendant’s serious medical needs 6 and lack of adequate medical care available in prison
- “The evidence was uneontroverted that incarceration would be life-threatening to Defendant and that adequate medical care would not be available to her in a correctional facility.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chavez, Hartz, Pickard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1996-12-06· cited 72×
- Glover v. GartmanD. New Mexico· 2012-09-27· cited 68×
- State v. ElliottNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-12-07· cited 43×
- State v. RuedaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-12-16· cited 28×
- State v. IraNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-01-24· cited 23×
- State v. LindseyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2017-03-20· cited 18×
- State v. ArringtonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-05-05· cited 4×
- Turcios, Juan Francisco v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2013-10-07
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 28,035×
- Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court· 1991-06-17· cited 6,530×
- State v. SparksNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-01-15· cited 94×
- LaFaut v. SmithFourth Circuit· 1987-12-02· cited 91×
- State v. VialpandoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1979-06-28· cited 64×
- State v. AugustusNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1981-10-20· cited 45×
- State v. ArchibequeNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1981-01-26· cited 23×
- State v. PattersonLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1990-12-18· cited 21×
- Naked City, Inc. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1984-01-26· cited 15×
- State v. DavisNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1986-05-06· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.