State v. Daugherty
Citations
- 30 Tex. 360
Syllabus
<p>Where an indictment omits a material word, although it be but a preposition or a helping verb, the court will not, from a knowledge of the language, supply the missing word, so as to supply the probable intention of the grand jury, but will sustain a judgment quashing the indictment.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- unlawful interference with private property or private rights
- unlawful interference with private property or private rights
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Donley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Edmondson v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1874-07-01· cited 29×
- Zapata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-04-25· cited 18×
- Pass v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1982-06-16· cited 14×
- Ridgeway v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1874-07-01· cited 10×
- State v. HaganSupreme Court of Missouri· 1901-11-12· cited 10×
- Kutler v. United StatesThird Circuit· 1934-05-08· cited 4×
- Caesar v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1905-06-15· cited 3×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1886-05-19· cited 1×
- Ewing v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1876-07-01
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1879-07-01
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1880-07-01
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.