Jones v. State
Citations
- 21 Tex. Ct. App. 349
- 17 S.W. 424
- 1886 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 150
Syllabus
<p>1. Assault to Murder—Indictment.—If an indictment omits a material word, although it be but a preposition or a helping verb, the court will not, from a knowledge of the language, supply the missing word so as to supply the probable intention of the grand jury. The charging part of the indictment in this case reads as follows: * * * * “Adam Carpenter and R. Jones, on the tenth day of May, 1884, did then and there unlawfully, and with malice aforethought, make an assault in, and upon the person of John Long, with intent him the said Long then and there kill and murder,” etc. Held, that the omission of the preposition “to” before the words “ kill and murder ” was fatal to the sufficiency of the indictment.</p> <p>2. Same—Indictment sufficient to charge an assault with intent to murder will support a conviction for an aggravated or a simple assault.</p>
Judges: White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Edmondson v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1874-07-01· cited 29×
- Bittick v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1874-07-01· cited 21×
- State v. DaughertyTexas Supreme Court· 1867-04-15· cited 13×
- Givens v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1851-07-01· cited 10×
- State v. HustonTexas Supreme Court· 1854-07-01· cited 7×
- Johnson v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1856-07-01· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.