Ridgeway v. State
Citations
- 41 Tex. 231
Syllabus
<p>1. Indictment—Theft.—An indictment for theft which fails to charge that the property alleged to have been unlawfully taken was taken “with intent to deprive the owner of the value of the same” is bad.</p> <p>2. Indictment—Certainty.—An indictment for theft should describe the property with reasonable certainty, when it is practicable to do so; and if the theft be of coin, the character of the coin should be stated. When a particular description cannot be given, that fact should be stated in the indictment.</p>
Judges: Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Studer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-11-21· cited 503×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1882-07-01· cited 4×
- Wells v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1878-07-01
- Sansbury v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1878-07-01
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1882-07-01
- Peralto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1885-02-14
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1902-12-17
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.