South Dakota Supreme Court· 10/30/1996
State v. Darby
Citations
- 1996 SD 127
- 556 N.W.2d 311
- 1996 S.D. LEXIS 135
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that deception by law enforcement may also be a consideration
- “[T]he nature of sex offenses involving minor children often precludes certainty with respect to time, especially where reporting of the incident is delayed.”
- in applying Blockburger test, court concluded that sexual contact and sexual penetration each required proof of element the other did not where only sexual contact required proof of specific intent to “ ‘arouse or gratify’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gilbertson, Miller, Amundson, Konenkamp, Sabers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. UngaWashington Supreme Court· 2008-11-26· cited 86×
- State v. StangaSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-09-20· cited 80×
- State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-06-30· cited 74×
- State v. TuttleSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-07-31· cited 62×
- State v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-03-29· cited 57×
- State v. FrazierSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-02-21· cited 55×
- State v. TofaniSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-07-12· cited 51×
- State v. BrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-09-15· cited 50×
- State v. PackedSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-07-18· cited 48×
- State v. ThompsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 47×
- State v. OwensSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-04-10· cited 42×
- State v. MoratoSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-11-29· cited 40×
- State v. SchmidtNebraska Court of Appeals· 1997-04-22· cited 39×
- State v. MoellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-08-30· cited 37×
- State v. HoadleySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-08-21· cited 37×
- State v. VerhoefSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-05-16· cited 33×
- State v. AesophSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-06-19· cited 33×
- State v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-06-24· cited 32×
- State v. GesingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-01-22· cited 29×
- State v. CarothersSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-11-15· cited 29×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 2,221×
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 2,048×
- State v. LogueSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-07-31· cited 119×
- State v. BrammerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-04-08· cited 105×
- State v. FloodySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-01-22· cited 87×
- State v. BaskerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1991-04-10· cited 74×
- State v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-08-03· cited 71×
- State v. JennerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-02-14· cited 68×
- Corbly v. MathesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 66×
- State v. SwallowSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-06-13· cited 65×
- State v. MuetzeSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-05-22· cited 61×
- State v. CaffreySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-04-06· cited 47×
- State v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-04-24· cited 45×
- State v. DickeySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-07-25· cited 42×
- State v. PerkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-07-12· cited 38×
- State v. WurtzSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-03-01· cited 31×
- State v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1975-01-15· cited 31×
- State v. Blue ThunderSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1991-02-20· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.