Skip to main content

State v. Darby

Citations

  • 1996 SD 127
  • 556 N.W.2d 311
  • 1996 S.D. LEXIS 135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that deception by law enforcement may also be a consideration
  • “[T]he nature of sex offenses involving minor children often precludes certainty with respect to time, especially where reporting of the incident is delayed.”
  • in applying Blockburger test, court concluded that sexual contact and sexual penetration each required proof of element the other did not where only sexual contact required proof of specific intent to “ ‘arouse or gratify’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gilbertson, Miller, Amundson, Konenkamp, Sabers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.