State v. Yoh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant’s statement admissible only if his “decision to initiate the third interview was voluntary, and not the product of the coercion that took place in the tainted second interview”
• “The only question we must answer is whether the tactics employed in the second interview [in which police violated Miranda and Edwards ] contributed to appellant's decisions to initiate the third interview, waive his Miranda rights ..., and make a confession.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).