Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 12/21/2000
State v. Daly
Citations
- 35 S.W.3d 237
- 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 8481
- 2000 WL 1862109
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that officer’s admission in court that he intended to question Daly in order to develop reasonable suspicion of a narcotics violation was an indication that Daly was not free to leave
- stating that officer’s admission in court that he intended to question Daly in order to develop reasonable suspicion of a narcotics violation was an indication that Daly was not free to leave
- stating that officer = s admission in court that he intended to question Daly in order to develop reasonable suspicion of a narcotics violation was an indication that Daly was not free to leave
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Kidd, Yeakel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- James v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2003-03-13· cited 234×
- Leach v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-12-21· cited 76×
- Herrera v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2002-07-17· cited 67×
- Magana v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2005-08-31· cited 58×
- Texas, the State Of v. Thirty Thousand Six Hundred Dollars and No/100 ($30,660.00) in U.S. CurrencyTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2004-05-20· cited 53×
- Saldivar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2006-11-16· cited 33×
- State v. GrayTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2004-09-22· cited 14×
- Amador v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2006-03-15· cited 10×
- Amador v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2007-12-12· cited 3×
- Theodora Gonzales v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-10-02
- Pablo Infante Magana v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2005-08-31
- Tarita James v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2003-01-09
- in the Interest of R.H.Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2006-11-16
- Luis Fernando Saldivar v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2006-11-16
- Edward Fabio Herrera v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2002-06-25
- Mario Gill Castillo v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2003-04-30
- Alvin Gerard Piper v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2004-08-25
- Daniel Rodriguez Garza v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2009-12-23
- Justin Amador v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2006-03-15
- Justin Amador v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2007-12-12
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-24· cited 6,556×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 3,670×
- Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-01-26· cited 3,205×
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court· 1996-11-18· cited 2,025×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-06-04· cited 1,223×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-11-15· cited 525×
- State v. IbarraCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-10· cited 267×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-04-15· cited 201×
- State v. VelasquezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-06-16· cited 178×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.