Skip to main content
· 7/18/2002

Kambury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Citations

  • 50 P.3d 1163
  • 334 Or. 367
  • 2002 Ore. LEXIS 456

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a similar products liability statute of limitations controls over the wrongful death statute of limitations
  • holding that a statute that addressed a type *Page 379 of injury caused by a particular source controlled over the general statute addressing all injuries of that type
  • holding that the two-year statute of limitation for product liability cases under ORS 30.905(2) controls in wrongful death cases arising from product defects rather than the three-year limitation period for wrongful death actions generally under ORS 30.020
  • holding a products liability statute of limitations controls over the wrongful death statute of limitations where “the legislature created a remedy for death caused by a particular source, specifically product defects”
  • so noting in context of claim for remedy for death caused by product defect
  • statute of limitation applying to claims for death caused by product defects is more specific, and therefore “must control over the more general wrongful death statute of limitations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Muniz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.