Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Connecticut Appellate Court· 9/9/1997

State v. Cummings

Citations

  • 46 Conn. App. 661
  • 701 A.2d 663
  • 1997 Conn. App. LEXIS 452

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding Section 53a-183 (a)(3) against attack in light of Supreme Court's decision in State v. Indrisano , 228 Conn. 795 (1994), holding that 53a-182 (a)(2) was impermissibly vague
  • rejecting challenge to jury instruction, applying term “repeatedly,” stating that state’s stalking statute “does not attempt to place the boundaries of time or space around a prescribed repetitive conduct” and informing jury that was their function as finders of fact
  • rejecting challenge to jury instruction, applying term “repeatedly,” stating that state’s stalking statute “does not attempt to place the boundaries of time or space around a prescribed repetitive conduct” and informing jury that was their function as finders of fact
  • rejecting challenge to jury instruction, applying term “repeatedly,” stating that state’s stalking statute “does not attempt to place the boundaries of time or space around a prescribed repetitive conduct” and informing jury that was their function as finders of fact
  • terms “repeatedly,” “follows,” and “lies in wait,” as 19 used in Section 53a-181d, were not unconstitutionally 20 vague
  • conviction for violating the protective order when the victim saw the defendant’s truck driving past her apartment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.