Skip to main content

State v. Crowe

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 5300

Syllabus

The defendant-appellant's consecutive sentences are not contrary to law.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he trial court first considered the principles and purposes of felony sentencing under R.C. 2929.11 prior to imposing Crowe’s sentence. Then, in its consecutive-sentence analysis, the trial court again referenced the purposes of R.C. 2929.11 in its consecutive-sentence imposition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.