Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 9/8/2009
State v. Cross
Citations
- 771 N.W.2d 879
- 2009 Minn. App. LEXIS 171
- 2009 WL 2851836
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that requirements that persons show identification and be photographed before entering courtroom was not closure of courtroom
- “A voluntary decision by a member of the public to avoid courtroom security procedures designed merely to record the identities of persons attending a hearing does not constitute a ‘closure’ for purposes of the Sixth Amendment right to a public trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson, Peterson, Connolly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Daniel P. Roberts v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2014-11-06· cited 25×
- State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-09-03· cited 10×
- State v. InfanteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-04-19· cited 6×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-08-12· cited 1×
- Christopher Matthew Henderson v. State of Alabama. (Appeal from Madison Circuit Court: CC-17-3064).Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2024-05-03
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1984-05-21· cited 2,166×
- Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-02-25· cited 744×
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court· 2006-03-08· cited 369×
- United States v. ShryockNinth Circuit· 2003-09-04· cited 199×
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-10-06· cited 124×
- State v. MahkukSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-08-09· cited 98×
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-11· cited 76×
- State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-08-23· cited 66×
- State v. BoboSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-07-30· cited 60×
- Barry Caesar Garcia v. Leann K. Bertsch, Director of the North Dakota Department of CorrectionsEighth Circuit· 2006-12-12· cited 42×
- State v. FageroosSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-05-05· cited 23×
- People v. SmallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-09-26· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.