Supreme Court of Minnesota· 5/26/1967
State v. Crosby
Citations
- 151 N.W.2d 297
- 277 Minn. 22
- 1967 Minn. LEXIS 899
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[PJroof of intent to commit a crime in connection with proof of burglary is always one that must rest on a permissible inference from the facts proved.”
- \[P]roof of intent to commit a crime in connection with proof of burglary is always one that must rest on a permissible inference from the facts proved.\
- circumstantial evidence, including footprints leading from the building, was sufficient to identify defendant as one of the burglars
- premeditation must generally be inferred from circumstantial evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Knutson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ColvinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-06-13· cited 64×
- State v. MytychSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-02-04· cited 41×
- State v. NesetNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1974-03-28· cited 40×
- State v. VailSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-01-12· cited 34×
- State v. KotkaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-08-04· cited 30×
- State v. BouwmanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-08-17· cited 28×
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-03-23· cited 25×
- State v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1970-04-03· cited 17×
- State v. ValstadSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1969-01-24· cited 17×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-12-08· cited 12×
- State v. WitteSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-04-11· cited 10×
- State v. HendricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-02-28· cited 8×
- State v. RingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-10-22· cited 7×
- State v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-08-03· cited 5×
- State v. MillsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-03-12· cited 4×
- State v. DillonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-01-12· cited 3×
- State v. HouffSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-05-28· cited 3×
- State v. PropotnikSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-05-10· cited 3×
- State v. AdamsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-04-02· cited 1×
- State v. BatesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-01-15
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.